Comments on: Class action firm subject to judgment http://overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: forum http://overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-37 forum Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:25:39 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=89#comment-37 <strong>Update: Ness Motley and James Down</strong> A feature from the Chicago Tribune on the Ness Motley sellout of its clients in the James Blair Down case (see Jul. 7 and follow-ups Aug. 24 and Jan. 17) is revealing about forum-shopping:[Blair] Hahn told his clients he knew... Update: Ness Motley and James Down

A feature from the Chicago Tribune on the Ness Motley sellout of its clients in the James Blair Down case (see Jul. 7 and follow-ups Aug. 24 and Jan. 17) is revealing about forum-shopping:[Blair] Hahn told his clients he knew…

]]> By: The Legal Reader http://overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-36 The Legal Reader Mon, 07 Jul 2003 18:03:21 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=89#comment-36 <strong>Big Litigation Firm Found to Have Acted Unethically</strong> "A federal jury in Chicago ordered a prominent South Carolina law firm yesterday to pay $36 million to a former client for what the jury found was unethical conduct in a class-action lawsuit. The firm, Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson &... Big Litigation Firm Found to Have Acted Unethically

“A federal jury in Chicago ordered a prominent South Carolina law firm yesterday to pay $36 million to a former client for what the jury found was unethical conduct in a class-action lawsuit. The firm, Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson &…

]]>