<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome Wall Street Journal readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/07/welcome-wall-street-journal-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/07/welcome-wall-street-journal-readers/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/07/welcome-wall-street-journal-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=142#comment-68</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Calif. bounty-hunting, again [reprint]&lt;/strong&gt;

California&#039;s s. 17200 &quot;unfair competition&quot; law, which Proposition 64 would narrow by introducing traditional notions of standing, has been covered extensively over the years on Overlawyered (stored Google search). I&#039;ll reprint only a couple of posts, b...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calif. bounty-hunting, again [reprint]</strong></p>
<p>California&#8217;s s. 17200 &#8220;unfair competition&#8221; law, which Proposition 64 would narrow by introducing traditional notions of standing, has been covered extensively over the years on Overlawyered (stored Google search). I&#8217;ll reprint only a couple of posts, b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

