<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comics? Must be for kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/08/comics-must-be-for-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/08/comics-must-be-for-kids/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BeldarBlog</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/08/comics-must-be-for-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>BeldarBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=215#comment-94</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Which headline has more sizzle: &quot;Supreme Court strips porno-comics of First Amendment Protection&quot; or &quot;Man convicted because his lawyer failed to object&quot;?&lt;/strong&gt;

That incredible constitutional ruling that stripped First Amendment protection from comic books because they&#039;re just for kids, surely that&#039;s a big deal! Except ... that&#039;s not at &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; what the Dallas Court of Appeals actually said.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which headline has more sizzle: &#8220;Supreme Court strips porno-comics of First Amendment Protection&#8221; or &#8220;Man convicted because his lawyer failed to object&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>That incredible constitutional ruling that stripped First Amendment protection from comic books because they&#8217;re just for kids, surely that&#8217;s a big deal! Except &#8230; that&#8217;s not at <i>all</i> what the Dallas Court of Appeals actually said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

