<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York abolishes ad damnum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-241</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt; clauses&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on <i>ad damnum</i> clauses</strong></p>
<p>Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-240</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt; clauses&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on <i>ad damnum</i> clauses</strong></p>
<p>Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-239</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt; clauses&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on <i>ad damnum</i> clauses</strong></p>
<p>Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-238</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New York abolishes &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Late last month New York Gov. George Pataki signed into law a bill that will abolish the requirement that a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit specify at the outset (in its &quot;ad damnum&quot; clause) the amount in dollar damages...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New York abolishes <i>ad damnum</i></strong></p>
<p>Late last month New York Gov. George Pataki signed into law a bill that will abolish the requirement that a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit specify at the outset (in its &#8220;ad damnum&#8221; clause) the amount in dollar damages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.113 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-25 15:55:04 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
