<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Eisenberg/Miller study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/02/update-eisenbergmiller-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/02/update-eisenbergmiller-study/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/02/update-eisenbergmiller-study/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=782#comment-470</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Update: Eisenberg/Miller study&lt;/strong&gt;

The Class Action Coalition releases a refutation of the much-hyped Eisenberg/Miller study (Jan. 16) to be published in the forthcoming Journal of Empirical Legal Studies purporting to analyze trends in attorneys&#039; fees in federal and state class actions...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update: Eisenberg/Miller study</strong></p>
<p>The Class Action Coalition releases a refutation of the much-hyped Eisenberg/Miller study (Jan. 16) to be published in the forthcoming Journal of Empirical Legal Studies purporting to analyze trends in attorneys&#8217; fees in federal and state class actions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

