<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Failure to Plead 17200 Claim = Malpractice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/06/failure-to-plead-17200-claim-malpractice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/06/failure-to-plead-17200-claim-malpractice/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=failure-to-plead-17200-claim-malpractice</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/06/failure-to-plead-17200-claim-malpractice/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1187#comment-678</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposition 64 [reprint]&lt;/strong&gt;

Another reprinted post, this one from Jim Copland Sept. 20:Gail Heriot at the Right Coast has a posting on Governor Schwarzenegger, in particular his recent endorsement of California&#039;s Proposition 64. As Heriot explains, the proposition seeks to return...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Proposition 64 [reprint]</strong></p>
<p>Another reprinted post, this one from Jim Copland Sept. 20:Gail Heriot at the Right Coast has a posting on Governor Schwarzenegger, in particular his recent endorsement of California&#8217;s Proposition 64. As Heriot explains, the proposition seeks to return&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/06/failure-to-plead-17200-claim-malpractice/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1187#comment-677</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Proposition 64&lt;/strong&gt;

Gail Heriot at the Right Coast has a posting on Governor Schwarzenegger, in particular his recent endorsement of California&#039;s Proposition 64. As Heriot explains, the proposition seeks to return the &quot;standing&quot; principle to California&#039;s notorious section...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Proposition 64</strong></p>
<p>Gail Heriot at the Right Coast has a posting on Governor Schwarzenegger, in particular his recent endorsement of California&#8217;s Proposition 64. As Heriot explains, the proposition seeks to return the &#8220;standing&#8221; principle to California&#8217;s notorious section&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Declarations and Exclusions</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/06/failure-to-plead-17200-claim-malpractice/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Declarations and Exclusions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1187#comment-676</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Good, But Not Good Enough: Successful Class Action Attorneys Potentially Liable For Not Pursuing Additional Claims&lt;/strong&gt;

Proving once again that there’s no pleasing some people, the Court of Appeal has permitted a suit for legal malpractice to proceed on a theory that the attorneys should have been even more successful than they were in an earlier
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good, But Not Good Enough: Successful Class Action Attorneys Potentially Liable For Not Pursuing Additional Claims</strong></p>
<p>Proving once again that there’s no pleasing some people, the Court of Appeal has permitted a suit for legal malpractice to proceed on a theory that the attorneys should have been even more successful than they were in an earlier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.109 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 02:48:59 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
