Comments on: In today’s WSJ http://overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: PointOfLaw Forum http://overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-932 PointOfLaw Forum Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:56:57 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1559#comment-932 <strong>In the WSJ</strong> I've got an op-ed in yesterday's Wall Street Journal discussing ballot measures that voters will decide in six states next Tuesday on litigation reform. Readers of this site got an advance look at a few of the highlights in this... In the WSJ

I’ve got an op-ed in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal discussing ballot measures that voters will decide in six states next Tuesday on litigation reform. Readers of this site got an advance look at a few of the highlights in this…

]]> By: ProfessorBainbridge.com http://overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-931 ProfessorBainbridge.com Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:04:38 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1559#comment-931 <strong>California Proposition 64: Vote Yes (Early and Often)</strong> The perspicacious Walter Olson explains why you should vote YES on Prop 64:Proposition 64, which would apply modest pruning to the state's famously overgrown "unfair competition" consumer-rights law, also known as 17200 after its section number in the ... California Proposition 64: Vote Yes (Early and Often)

The perspicacious Walter Olson explains why you should vote YES on Prop 64:Proposition 64, which would apply modest pruning to the state’s famously overgrown “unfair competition” consumer-rights law, also known as 17200 after its section number in the …

]]>