<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: s. 17200 (and Proposition 64) roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:37:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: March 31 roundup</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-43878</link>
		<dc:creator>March 31 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-43878</guid>
		<description>[...] After nine years, the notorious Bill Lerach California-unfair-competition-law suit against Kwikset (over several screws from Taiwan in a lock marked &#8220;Made in America&#8221;) finally winds down [California Civil Justice, earlier] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After nine years, the notorious Bill Lerach California-unfair-competition-law suit against Kwikset (over several screws from Taiwan in a lock marked &#8220;Made in America&#8221;) finally winds down [California Civil Justice, earlier] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-936</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Calif. court OKs countersuit in &quot;shakedown&quot; case&lt;/strong&gt;

Just over a year ago, following numerous scandals about law firms&#039; filing of mass shakedown suits based on California&#039;s s. 17200 unfair-competition law (UCL), the state&#039;s voters curtailed somewhat the law&#039;s extortive potential by requiring...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calif. court OKs countersuit in &#8220;shakedown&#8221; case</strong></p>
<p>Just over a year ago, following numerous scandals about law firms&#8217; filing of mass shakedown suits based on California&#8217;s s. 17200 unfair-competition law (UCL), the state&#8217;s voters curtailed somewhat the law&#8217;s extortive potential by requiring&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-935</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;California&#039;s Proposition 79&lt;/strong&gt;

As CoyoteBlog (Oct. 18) notes, this ballot initiative on drug prices contains a sneaky, little-discussed provision that will empower trial lawyers to file bounty-hunting suits against pharmaceutical companies if the companies charge prices &quot;that lead...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>California&#8217;s Proposition 79</strong></p>
<p>As CoyoteBlog (Oct. 18) notes, this ballot initiative on drug prices contains a sneaky, little-discussed provision that will empower trial lawyers to file bounty-hunting suits against pharmaceutical companies if the companies charge prices &#8220;that lead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f/k/a . . . .</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>f/k/a . . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-934</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;along the sidewalk&lt;/strong&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>along the sidewalk</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.116 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 11:44:02 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
