<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cosmetics class action update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Update: Judge OKs cosmetics class action settlement</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/comment-page-1/#comment-38673</link>
		<dc:creator>Update: Judge OKs cosmetics class action settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1662#comment-38673</guid>
		<description>[...] 9). For earlier coverage of the controversial settlement, see Jul. 21, 2003, Apr. 14, May 19, and Dec. 3, 2004, and Jan. 14, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9). For earlier coverage of the controversial settlement, see Jul. 21, 2003, Apr. 14, May 19, and Dec. 3, 2004, and Jan. 14, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge blinks at cosmetics settlement</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/comment-page-1/#comment-38672</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge blinks at cosmetics settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1662#comment-38672</guid>
		<description>[...] for that no-blush, high-gloss, invisible-foundation antitrust class action (see Dec. 3 and links from there): at a two-hour hearing, federal judge Saundra Armstrong declined to approve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for that no-blush, high-gloss, invisible-foundation antitrust class action (see Dec. 3 and links from there): at a two-hour hearing, federal judge Saundra Armstrong declined to approve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coyote Blog</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Coyote Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2004 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1662#comment-992</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You Get a Lipstick, I get $24 Million&lt;/strong&gt;

From Overlawyered:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You Get a Lipstick, I get $24 Million</strong></p>
<p>From Overlawyered:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

