<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: emotional-distress claim against divorce lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: f/k/a . . . .</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>f/k/a . . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1742#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;the headless snowman&lt;/strong&gt;

Holiday Bonus:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>the headless snowman</strong></p>
<p>Holiday Bonus:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Declarations and Exclusions</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Declarations and Exclusions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1742#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Emotional Rescue: Appellate Court Remains Skeptical Toward Emotional Distress Recovery in Legal Malpractice Cases&lt;/strong&gt;

Under current California law, emotional distress damages are generally not permitted in legal malpractice cases because the courts regard most such claims [rightly, in the view of Decs
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Emotional Rescue: Appellate Court Remains Skeptical Toward Emotional Distress Recovery in Legal Malpractice Cases</strong></p>
<p>Under current California law, emotional distress damages are generally not permitted in legal malpractice cases because the courts regard most such claims [rightly, in the view of Decs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

