Negligent sex

by Walter Olson on May 18, 2005

Eugene Volokh and Christine Hurt (both May 17) analyze the Massachusetts case everyone is talking about, in which a man sued his girlfriend after suffering a particularly intimate (and awful-sounding) trauma in bed. The court decided that the standard for liability over sexually inflicted injury should be wantonness and recklessness, rather than mere lack of reasonable care.

Related posts

{ 3 comments }

1 Musings from Brian J. Noggle 05.18.05 at 12:05 pm

Judicial Pr0n

02-P-381 Appeals Court: JOHN DOE[1] vs. MARY MOE.[2]….

2 Wampum 05.21.05 at 11:46 am

Wanton and Reckless Sex Bad, Negligent Sex OK

I wonder what James Dobson would make of the decision in a recent Massachusetts lawsuit. Link via Walter Olson at Overlawyered. The case involves the type of mundane, everyday facts that one often encounters: The summary judgment record, viewed in…

3 Wampum 05.22.05 at 8:18 am

Wanton and Reckless Sex Bad, Negligent Sex OK

I wonder what James Dobson would make of the decision in a recent Massachusetts lawsuit. Link via Walter Olson at Overlawyered. The case involves the type of mundane, everyday facts that one often encounters: The summary judgment record, viewed in…

Comments on this entry are closed.