<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wesley Snipes exonerated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/10/wesley-snipes-exonerated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/10/wesley-snipes-exonerated/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hoist by his own petard? The case of Jack Tuckner and Lisa Brockington</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/10/wesley-snipes-exonerated/comment-page-1/#comment-20333</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoist by his own petard? The case of Jack Tuckner and Lisa Brockington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2672#comment-20333</guid>
		<description>[...] now.  We discussed the problems of the publicity of complaint allegations by the deranged in a 2005 post about Wesley Snipes. (Contrary to the claim of a commenter, I don&#8217;t dispute that some of Brockington&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now.  We discussed the problems of the publicity of complaint allegations by the deranged in a 2005 post about Wesley Snipes. (Contrary to the claim of a commenter, I don&#8217;t dispute that some of Brockington&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

