Comments on: $3.36M for blind woman replaced by blind woman http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/336m-for-blind-woman-replaced-by-blind-woman/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=336m-for-blind-woman-replaced-by-blind-woman Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sat, 26 May 2012 17:50:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Econbrowser http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/336m-for-blind-woman-replaced-by-blind-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-1626 Econbrowser Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:44:20 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2838#comment-1626 <strong>Blind leading the blind</strong> Score another one for the Americans with Disabilities Act. Blind leading the blind

Score another one for the Americans with Disabilities Act.

]]> By: Econbrowser http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/336m-for-blind-woman-replaced-by-blind-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-1625 Econbrowser Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:38:30 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2838#comment-1625 <strong>Blind leading the blind</strong> <p>Score another one for the Americans with Disabilities Act.</p> Blind leading the blind

Score another one for the Americans with Disabilities Act.

]]> By: Ted http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/336m-for-blind-woman-replaced-by-blind-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-1624 Ted Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:21:50 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2838#comment-1624 If this was a retaliation claim, Ima is correct. The press coverage and attorneys' opening and closing statements called it a discrimination claim, though this is, of course, not dispositive on the question of whether there was also a retaliation claim. Regardless, hitting taxpayers for $3 million+ is unreasonable, and the evidence of insubordination seems undisputed. If this was a retaliation claim, Ima is correct. The press coverage and attorneys’ opening and closing statements called it a discrimination claim, though this is, of course, not dispositive on the question of whether there was also a retaliation claim. Regardless, hitting taxpayers for $3 million+ is unreasonable, and the evidence of insubordination seems undisputed.

]]> By: Ima Fish http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/336m-for-blind-woman-replaced-by-blind-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-1623 Ima Fish Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:43:48 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2838#comment-1623 It sounds more a retailiation claim than a discrimination claim. Under such a claim it doesn't matter who replaced you. It sounds more a retailiation claim than a discrimination claim. Under such a claim it doesn’t matter who replaced you.

]]>