One can understand why Wal-Mart is upset that a former executive, Tom Coughlin, allegedly swiped a half-million dollars, and wants to stop paying him in addition to referring the matter to federal prosecutors. But one doesn’t understand why Wal-Mart, in an effort to recover a fairly small sum, is arguing to the court that it should disregard the mutual waiver and release that Coughlin signed with Wal-Mart when he left the job. Surely the corporation would be better off on the whole with a legal rule that strictly enforces releases than one that judges the validity of a release on a case-by-case basis. (AP, Nov. 2).
Disclosures: As of the date of this post, I own Wal-Mart stock worth between $50,001 to $100,000.
Related posts
In workplace
Ted Frank on Wal-Mart’s Mysterious Lawsuit
Most of you know that Wal-Mart fired Tom Coughlin for misuse of corporate funds. (Actually Coughlin retired in January, and was removed from the board in March). A big problem with Wal-Mart’s civil claim against Coughlin is that the two…
Schaeffer on litigation financing
Evan Schaeffer links to an American Lawyer piece on litigation financing by Alison Frankel—the practice of contingent loans that, though charging a high interest rate, are not recoverable if the attorney loses the litigation. (Ohio has outlawed t…