<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next week&#8217;s balloting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/next-weeks-balloting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/next-weeks-balloting/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PointOfLaw Forum</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/next-weeks-balloting/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>PointOfLaw Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2751#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;California Prop 79&lt;/strong&gt;

On National Review Online, Paul Howard of the Manhattan Institute warns against it:The proposition [among other provisions] also makes &quot;profiteering&quot; by companies illegal. Profiteering is defined as &quot;an unconscionable price&quot; or an &quot;unreasonable profit,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>California Prop 79</strong></p>
<p>On National Review Online, Paul Howard of the Manhattan Institute warns against it:The proposition [among other provisions] also makes &#8220;profiteering&#8221; by companies illegal. Profiteering is defined as &#8220;an unconscionable price&#8221; or an &#8220;unreasonable profit,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

