<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outdoor smoking bans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/outdoor-smoking-bans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/outdoor-smoking-bans/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=outdoor-smoking-bans</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Deoxy</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/outdoor-smoking-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Deoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2768#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>I personally abhor most laws regulating personal behaviour... but I have little problem with bans such as this, as thy are not PERSONAL behaviour: they affect others.  Apply same logic as public decency laws.

Snuffing, as best I can tell, would affect no one else, as would chewing nicotine gum (if you don&#039;t spit it on public property).  Even chewing tobacco has a fairly solid case (though less solid than the above).  But smoking in public is a very PUBLIC activity, which every nearby citizen partakes of, willing or not.  It seems that the proper way to deal with this would be local laws.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally abhor most laws regulating personal behaviour&#8230; but I have little problem with bans such as this, as thy are not PERSONAL behaviour: they affect others.  Apply same logic as public decency laws.</p>
<p>Snuffing, as best I can tell, would affect no one else, as would chewing nicotine gum (if you don&#8217;t spit it on public property).  Even chewing tobacco has a fairly solid case (though less solid than the above).  But smoking in public is a very PUBLIC activity, which every nearby citizen partakes of, willing or not.  It seems that the proper way to deal with this would be local laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Eipers</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/outdoor-smoking-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Eipers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2768#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>These smoking bans, in order to be worrisome, need to be &lt;i&gt;enforced.&lt;/i&gt;  Otherwise it is as if they don&#039;t exist.  I work for a major academic medical center, where people sit outside the hospital door on benches with metal &quot;no smoking&quot; plaques riveted to them.  You guessed it- they sit on the benches, smoking...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These smoking bans, in order to be worrisome, need to be <i>enforced.</i>  Otherwise it is as if they don&#8217;t exist.  I work for a major academic medical center, where people sit outside the hospital door on benches with metal &#8220;no smoking&#8221; plaques riveted to them.  You guessed it- they sit on the benches, smoking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Boser</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/11/outdoor-smoking-bans/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Boser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2768#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>I have a friend, an asmatic, who has trouble even at restraurants and stores who don&#039;t allow smoking.

The reason, smokers go right outside the door to smoke.   Right outside.   So getting in and out FORCES close exposure to smoke.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a friend, an asmatic, who has trouble even at restraurants and stores who don&#8217;t allow smoking.</p>
<p>The reason, smokers go right outside the door to smoke.   Right outside.   So getting in and out FORCES close exposure to smoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.115 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 14:30:42 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
