<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Peru eyes lawsuit against Yale over relics&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2005/12/peru-eyes-lawsuit-against-yale-over-relics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/12/peru-eyes-lawsuit-against-yale-over-relics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=peru-eyes-lawsuit-against-yale-over-relics</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/12/peru-eyes-lawsuit-against-yale-over-relics/comment-page-1/#comment-1677</link>
		<dc:creator>Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2868#comment-1677</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Antiquities prosecutions&lt;/strong&gt;

Melik Kaylan has advice for curator/jailbirds (&quot;A Civilized Solution to Looted Art&quot;, WSJ/OpinionJournal.com, Dec. 14). More: Apr. 28, Dec. 5....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Antiquities prosecutions</strong></p>
<p>Melik Kaylan has advice for curator/jailbirds (&#8220;A Civilized Solution to Looted Art&#8221;, WSJ/OpinionJournal.com, Dec. 14). More: Apr. 28, Dec. 5&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2005/12/peru-eyes-lawsuit-against-yale-over-relics/comment-page-1/#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2868#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t there be a statute of limitations problem with such a suit? Or is there a special exception to normal statutes of limitations when the subject is an ancient artifact?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t there be a statute of limitations problem with such a suit? Or is there a special exception to normal statutes of limitations when the subject is an ancient artifact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.106 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 15:16:06 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
