They operate as a pincer movement, contends Brian Anderson in City Journal, and they’re both aimed at choking off certain unwelcome (if popular) points of view in public discussion. (”The Plot to Shush Rush and O’Reilly”, Winter).
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on January 18, 2006
They operate as a pincer movement, contends Brian Anderson in City Journal, and they’re both aimed at choking off certain unwelcome (if popular) points of view in public discussion. (”The Plot to Shush Rush and O’Reilly”, Winter).
Tagged as: politics

Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIY Themes.
{ 1 comment }
The “Fairness Doctrine”
Nat Hentoff explains how its revival would imperil free speech on the air (Hillsdale Imprimis, January). See Jan. 18, etc….
Comments on this entry are closed.