http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/bartlett-impostor/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/bartlett-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-2342 Walter Olson Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:47:50 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3166#comment-2342 The omission of the line for Reagan was my fault, not Bruce Bartlett's. Fixed now, and the number furnished by Rebecca is indeed the correct one. The omission of the line for Reagan was my fault, not Bruce Bartlett’s. Fixed now, and the number furnished by Rebecca is indeed the correct one.

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/bartlett-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-2341 Rebecca Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:24:22 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3166#comment-2341 The table omits Reagan, for which I'm sure there is a good reason in context, but it's a little confusing here. According to <a href="http://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0403040-00&templatename=/article/article.html" rel="nofollow">this site</a>, Reagan vetoed 78 bills. The table omits Reagan, for which I’m sure there is a good reason in context, but it’s a little confusing here. According to this site, Reagan vetoed 78 bills.

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/bartlett-impostor/comment-page-1/#comment-2340 Frank Ch. Eigler Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:09:01 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3166#comment-2340 Wouldn't this list be made more intelligible if it identified the dominant parties in power in Congress during each presidency? Wouldn’t this list be made more intelligible if it identified the dominant parties in power in Congress during each presidency?

]]>