<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Feds say Pellicano taped client talks&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pellicano fallout, cont&#039;d&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;While top entertainment lawyer Terry Christensen is the only attorney indicted so far in connection with [indicted private investigator Anthony] Pellicano, several others face litigation that could cripple their practices -- and possibly break up...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pellicano fallout, cont&#8217;d</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;While top entertainment lawyer Terry Christensen is the only attorney indicted so far in connection with [indicted private investigator Anthony] Pellicano, several others face litigation that could cripple their practices &#8212; and possibly break up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunner</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>I have not followed this story much. I find this new information very interesting. It seems the ones who pull the strings never get caught.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not followed this story much. I find this new information very interesting. It seems the ones who pull the strings never get caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Olson</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>Given the context of the rest of the piece, I think it&#039;s safe to assume that AP intends &quot;have&quot; to be the verb, meaning merely that the feds are in possession of such tapes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the context of the rest of the piece, I think it&#8217;s safe to assume that AP intends &#8220;have&#8221; to be the verb, meaning merely that the feds are in possession of such tapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingmanor</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>kingmanor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>The sentence from the AP article is not written well.  Is &quot;have&quot; the verb, or is &quot;taped&quot;?  In other words did the prosecution reveal that they taped converstions, or that they have them in their possession.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sentence from the AP article is not written well.  Is &#8220;have&#8221; the verb, or is &#8220;taped&#8221;?  In other words did the prosecution reveal that they taped converstions, or that they have them in their possession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

