Comments on: Update: Dallas Observer doesn’t owe $1 billion http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/update-dallas-observer-doesnt-owe-1-billion/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=update-dallas-observer-doesnt-owe-1-billion Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sat, 26 May 2012 21:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Deoxy http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/update-dallas-observer-doesnt-owe-1-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2204 Deoxy Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:50:22 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3097#comment-2204 Wouldn't it be impossible to "disclose" something that is already public knowledge? Wouldn’t it be impossible to “disclose” something that is already public knowledge?

]]> By: Overlawyered http://overlawyered.com/2006/02/update-dallas-observer-doesnt-owe-1-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-2205 Overlawyered Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:01:40 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3097#comment-2205 <strong>HIV-positive man sues Dallas Observer</strong> "Joe Doe", the HIV+ plaintiff in a Texas state lawsuit, is a member of the choral group "Positive Voices"--which has produced a CD with his photo and his real name. Nevertheless, when the alternative weekly... HIV-positive man sues Dallas Observer

“Joe Doe”, the HIV+ plaintiff in a Texas state lawsuit, is a member of the choral group “Positive Voices”–which has produced a CD with his photo and his real name. Nevertheless, when the alternative weekly…

]]>