Attorney John Claassen, formerly of Skadden Arps, is suing online matchmaker eHarmony.com, which declined to list him because he is not yet divorced and it has a rule against listing profiles of persons who admit to being married. He’s claiming marital-status discrimination in his suit, filed in Alameda County. (Knight-Ridder; AP; SFist)(& welcome Sploid readers). More: Akhmed Al-Fayyed explains why he thinks eHarmony might lose (Mar. 29).
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
-
Point of Law- Around the web, November 9Small favors dept.: managers of House health bill agree to amendment reducing incentive for states to repeal existing fee/award limits, but states without such limits would still be accorded new incentives not to adopt them [Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Pero]... […]Walter Olson
- Medical malpractice reform omitted from House health care billThe lack of medical liability reform in the House health care bill and the political power of trial lawyers were two points argued late Saturday when Republicans moved to recommit the health care bill, H.R. 3962, to committee. A motion... […]Carter Wood
- House passes chemical facility security bill, welcomes litigationThe U.S. House of Representatives on Friday voted 230-193 to pass H.R. 2868, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act. (Roll call vote.) All but 21 Democrats voted in favor; Republicans all opposed. With the announcement yesterday of October's 10.2 percent unemployment,... […]Carter Wood
- "Spano's Suicide: Housing Plan Doomed County Exec"The New York Post has now picked up a slightly shortened version of my City Journal piece on the housing lawsuit that contributed to a voter revolt in Westchester. P.S. The Weekly Standard "Scrapbook" feature discusses the piece, as do... […]Walter Olson
- "Chloroform for tort reform"The Washington Times assails as "dishonest" and a "poison pill" the House health bill's provisions bribing states not to enact limits on malpractice awards and attorneys' fees.... […]Walter Olson
- Around the web, November 9
- Volokh
- Federal Rules Interpreted as Barring Twitter Coverage of Trial from Inside CourtroomFrom United States v. Shelnutt (M.D. Ga. Nov. 2): A reporter for the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer newspaper has requested that he be allowed to use his handheld electronic device (e.g., a BlackBerry or cellular telephone) during the trial of the above-captioned criminal case to send electronic messages describing the court proceedings directly from the courtroom […]Eugene Volokh
- Limits on the Necessary & Proper Clause?On January 12th, the Supreme Court will hear argument on a case that promises to find a limit to the power of Congress “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, [...] […]Randy Barnett
- Muhammad: The “Banned” ImagesI’m pleased to be the first to report that the newly founded Voltaire Press at Duke University has just published Muhammad: The “Banned” Images. The book includes all the images that were omitted by the Yale University Press from Jytte Klausen’s The Cartoons That Shook the World — including the 12 Mohammed cartoons — [...] […]Eugene Volokh
- The Psychology of a TerroristThere seems to be a strange subtext in some press stories hinting that the suspect in the Fort Hood shootings, Nidal Malik Hasan, had psychological problems or motivations of a kind that would somehow render his acts inconsistent with terrorism or with Islamic terrorism. Does the press realize that the psychological profile of a [...] […]Jim Lindgren
- More Evidence for Christina Hoff Sommers’ “War Against Boys” Theory?The L.A. Parks Department offers an after-school day care program that provides a “neutering fun and safe environment.” Copyright © 2008 This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing [...] […]Eugene Volokh
- Federal Rules Interpreted as Barring Twitter Coverage of Trial from Inside Courtroom
Media Bloggers Association
CPSIA
{ 1 trackback }
{ 3 comments }
I had a great comment about this guy, but then I deleted it because I figured I might get sued!
And when I thought about the situation, I realized any editorial comment would be superfluous anyway!
Meanwhile, you could just as easily imagine a spouse suing eHarmony for “tortious interference with the marriage” because it ALLOWED marrieds to list. You know the legal culture is out of control when any imaginable course of action would lead to suit.
Assuming that gender is also one of the protected classes, what in the world are they gonna do about the unisex health clubs?
Huh…
Comments on this entry are closed.