<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dating service sued for turning away married man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Suit forces eHarmony to offer gay dating service&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-34998</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Suit forces eHarmony to offer gay dating service&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-34998</guid>
		<description>[...] 19, FoxNews.com)(via Friedersdorf, see also Mataconis). Earlier coverage: Jun. 1 and Jun. 8, 2007; Mar. 26, 2006 (married man wants listing). More: lawyer in parallel California suit against eHarmony says it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 19, FoxNews.com)(via Friedersdorf, see also Mataconis). Earlier coverage: Jun. 1 and Jun. 8, 2007; Mar. 26, 2006 (married man wants listing). More: lawyer in parallel California suit against eHarmony says it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wavemaker</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>wavemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>Assuming that &lt;i&gt;gender&lt;/i&gt; is also one of the protected classes, what in the world are they gonna do about the unisex health clubs?

Huh...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming that <i>gender</i> is also one of the protected classes, what in the world are they gonna do about the unisex health clubs?</p>
<p>Huh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilson</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-2539</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-2539</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, you could just as easily imagine a spouse suing eHarmony for &quot;tortious interference with the marriage&quot; because it ALLOWED marrieds to list. You know the legal culture is out of control when any imaginable course of action would lead to suit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, you could just as easily imagine a spouse suing eHarmony for &#8220;tortious interference with the marriage&#8221; because it ALLOWED marrieds to list. You know the legal culture is out of control when any imaginable course of action would lead to suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some potential date</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>some potential date</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>I had a great comment about this guy, but then I deleted it because I figured I might get sued!&lt;p&gt;And when I thought about the situation, I realized any  editorial comment would be superfluous anyway!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a great comment about this guy, but then I deleted it because I figured I might get sued!
<p>And when I thought about the situation, I realized any  editorial comment would be superfluous anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.170 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 20:22:14 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
