The Massachusetts Supreme Court rules it can be banned. The losing party: the American Lithuanian Naturalization Club of Athol, Mass. (Denise Lavoie, “SJC: Local health board can ban smoking in private clubs”, Boston Globe, Mar. 22)(via Balko).
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on March 29, 2006
The Massachusetts Supreme Court rules it can be banned. The losing party: the American Lithuanian Naturalization Club of Athol, Mass. (Denise Lavoie, “SJC: Local health board can ban smoking in private clubs”, Boston Globe, Mar. 22)(via Balko).
Tagged as: Massachusetts, tobacco

Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIY Themes.
{ 3 comments }
What differentiates a private club from a private residence?
Of course, we already prohibit certain things in private residences (such as smoking certain things).
Not saying that’s good, just the way it is.
I don’t need a liquor license to invite someone to drink in my home. My home is also not a place “of employment.”
If you employed a butler, maid, or nanny (as some people do), then your house IS a “place of employment”.
The difference between a private “club” and a private “residence” is not all that great.
Comments on this entry are closed.