Comments on: BREAKING: California Supreme Court throws out “Friends” sexual harassment suit http://overlawyered.com/2006/04/breaking-california-supreme-court-throws-out-friends-sexual-harassment-suit/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:26:26 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Celia Farber http://overlawyered.com/2006/04/breaking-california-supreme-court-throws-out-friends-sexual-harassment-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-2743 Celia Farber Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:56:14 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3364#comment-2743 Do people here think, or even better, have evidence, for my thesis/thought that Sexual Harassment litigation is all but a dead industry? I always said it depended for its survival upon weather systems in the sex culture--waves of fear and rage and hallucination--that are no longer potent, or there at all. It can't really exist as LAW, outside of its psychic/sexual/emotional elements. Its sheer invisibility in other words--the subjectivity of the "damage" done. If I am right, I want to start jubilating. Any thoughts anyone? Do people here think, or even better, have evidence, for my thesis/thought that Sexual Harassment litigation is all but a dead industry? I always said it depended for its survival upon weather systems in the sex culture–waves of fear and rage and hallucination–that are no longer potent, or there at all. It can’t really exist as LAW, outside of its psychic/sexual/emotional elements. Its sheer invisibility in other words–the subjectivity of the “damage” done.

If I am right, I want to start jubilating.

Any thoughts anyone?

]]> By: Gunner http://overlawyered.com/2006/04/breaking-california-supreme-court-throws-out-friends-sexual-harassment-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-2742 Gunner Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:39:30 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3364#comment-2742 Maybe I am taking a simplistic view of the case but why did it take so long to be dismissed? Maybe I am taking a simplistic view of the case but why did it take so long to be dismissed?

]]>