<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Inside Milberg&#8217;s Credenza&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/inside-milbergs-credenza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/inside-milbergs-credenza/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom T.</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/inside-milbergs-credenza/comment-page-1/#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 09:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3473#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>wavemaker, I think they&#039;re referring to a waiver of the privilege as between Milberg Weiss and the firm&#039;s own counsel -- i.e., the attorneys that represented it in the course of this investigation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wavemaker, I think they&#8217;re referring to a waiver of the privilege as between Milberg Weiss and the firm&#8217;s own counsel &#8212; i.e., the attorneys that represented it in the course of this investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wavemaker</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/inside-milbergs-credenza/comment-page-1/#comment-3004</link>
		<dc:creator>wavemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 05:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3473#comment-3004</guid>
		<description>Walter, this may seem an obtuse question, but the attorney-client privilege is not the &lt;i&gt;attorney&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; to waive -- it&#039;s the client&#039;s, so how does the DOJ get away with coercing a violation of the CPR?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, this may seem an obtuse question, but the attorney-client privilege is not the <i>attorney&#8217;s</i> to waive &#8212; it&#8217;s the client&#8217;s, so how does the DOJ get away with coercing a violation of the CPR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom T.</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/inside-milbergs-credenza/comment-page-1/#comment-3003</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 22:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3473#comment-3003</guid>
		<description>How does this affect the ability of Milberg Weiss attorneys to appear as counsel for some party in litigation involving the United States?  Are there conflict issues?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this affect the ability of Milberg Weiss attorneys to appear as counsel for some party in litigation involving the United States?  Are there conflict issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

