<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuart Taylor, Jr. on Duke rape case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/stuart-taylor-jr-on-duke-rape-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/stuart-taylor-jr-on-duke-rape-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stuart-taylor-jr-on-duke-rape-case</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Bader</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/stuart-taylor-jr-on-duke-rape-case/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Bader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 17:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3474#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>The ethical violations of the prosecutor, Mike Nifong, are blatant, ranging from making baseless, prejudicial statements in violation of Rule 3.8 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, to intimidating witnesses, to withholding evidence that he was legally obligated to divulge to the defense.

Apparently, the weaker the prosecution&#039;s case, the more a prosecutor must bend and twist the rules to hide the weaknesses of his case.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ethical violations of the prosecutor, Mike Nifong, are blatant, ranging from making baseless, prejudicial statements in violation of Rule 3.8 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct, to intimidating witnesses, to withholding evidence that he was legally obligated to divulge to the defense.</p>
<p>Apparently, the weaker the prosecution&#8217;s case, the more a prosecutor must bend and twist the rules to hide the weaknesses of his case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.106 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 23:33:59 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
