They’re a lot more common than you might think, according to this website. See Apr. 6.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
Schools for Misrule
Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
Cato Institute
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
{ 2 comments }
So what’s a judge to do? Consider someone automatically innocent if they confess in order to prevent convicting someone who comitted fraud by confessing to something he didn’t do?
I don’t know if false confessions are as common as the web site claims, but there needs to be a better accounting by police departments of the tactics that they use when interviewing suspects. Perhaps require each interrogation session to be videotaped?
The drawback is, if we start second-guessing every interrogation tactic the cops use, there will be grounds to throw out EVERY confession. I wonder if psychiatrists could come up with some kind of standard protocol that would be kind of a “safe harbor” for interrogations, one not likely to result in a false confession.
Comments on this entry are closed.