<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assumption of risk (mollusc dept.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 02:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wavemaker</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/comment-page-1/#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>wavemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3556#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>This closely follows the 1964 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/a_recipe_for_greatness.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Webster&lt;/a&gt; case we posted on last month.

&quot;Judge John Galasso dismissed the lawsuit, saying Slaymaker should have had a &quot;reasonable expectation&quot; that a dish containing mussels could have shells in it.&quot; Unfortunately, I cannot locate a copy of the opinion on-line, but I&#039;ll bet Webster is cited in the decision.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This closely follows the 1964 <a href="http://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/a_recipe_for_greatness.html" rel="nofollow">Webster</a> case we posted on last month.</p>
<p>&#8220;Judge John Galasso dismissed the lawsuit, saying Slaymaker should have had a &#8220;reasonable expectation&#8221; that a dish containing mussels could have shells in it.&#8221; Unfortunately, I cannot locate a copy of the opinion on-line, but I&#8217;ll bet Webster is cited in the decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bird dog</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/comment-page-1/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator>bird dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3556#comment-3176</guid>
		<description>How many Americans are walking around just praying that something sue-able will happen to them? Remember the old bumpersticker &quot;Please hit me. I need the money&quot;? I am shocked! Shellfish have shells?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many Americans are walking around just praying that something sue-able will happen to them? Remember the old bumpersticker &#8220;Please hit me. I need the money&#8221;? I am shocked! Shellfish have shells?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.281 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 23:50:09 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
