<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: By popular demand: the $400,000 permanent erection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/by-popular-demand-the-400000-permanent-erection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/by-popular-demand-the-400000-permanent-erection/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donna Baver Rovito</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/by-popular-demand-the-400000-permanent-erection/comment-page-1/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Baver Rovito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3621#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>On average, according to the much-misinterpreted &quot;Harvard study&quot; which determined that 40% of malpractice cases are groundless, plaintiffs receive only 46% of each award - so your estimate is close.  Mr. Lennon likely received only $180,000, after experts and court costs were paid OUT OF HIS SHARE.

&lt;i&gt;NB that the 46% figure includes defense costs. -- TF&lt;/i&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On average, according to the much-misinterpreted &#8220;Harvard study&#8221; which determined that 40% of malpractice cases are groundless, plaintiffs receive only 46% of each award &#8211; so your estimate is close.  Mr. Lennon likely received only $180,000, after experts and court costs were paid OUT OF HIS SHARE.</p>
<p><i>NB that the 46% figure includes defense costs. &#8212; TF</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AM</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2006/06/by-popular-demand-the-400000-permanent-erection/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>AM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3621#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why the press constantly misrepresents these awards. He did not get $400,000. His lawyer took a huge chunk of that, a low estimate of $200,000. Defense lawyes probably got another $300,000.

The headline shouldn&#039;t be &quot;Man gets $400k for . . .&quot; it should be &quot;Lawyers get $500k dragging injured man through years of litigation.&quot;

People need to start analyzing these cases by looking at where the money goes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why the press constantly misrepresents these awards. He did not get $400,000. His lawyer took a huge chunk of that, a low estimate of $200,000. Defense lawyes probably got another $300,000.</p>
<p>The headline shouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;Man gets $400k for . . .&#8221; it should be &#8220;Lawyers get $500k dragging injured man through years of litigation.&#8221;</p>
<p>People need to start analyzing these cases by looking at where the money goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

