Comments on: Junk fax law trips up lawyer http://overlawyered.com/2006/09/junk-fax-law-trips-up-lawyer/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Deoxy http://overlawyered.com/2006/09/junk-fax-law-trips-up-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-4016 Deoxy Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:15:51 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3927#comment-4016 I don't think he's disapproving of the judg's decision, merely pointing out that lawyers, too, get caught in the junk fax laws (which has had several hot topics lately). I don’t think he’s disapproving of the judg’s decision, merely pointing out that lawyers, too, get caught in the junk fax laws (which has had several hot topics lately).

]]> By: dweeb http://overlawyered.com/2006/09/junk-fax-law-trips-up-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-4015 dweeb Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:26:26 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3927#comment-4015 <i>Bluestone claimed to be sending out informational advisories on legal issues, but a judge ruled that he was promoting his practice</i> I suppose you're upset that the judge declined to buy the Brooklyn Bridge from Mr. Bluestone, as well? Yeah, sure, he was sending out the information out of the goodness of his heart. I'll bet he didn't make any effort to share any advisories with anyone not in a position to purchase his services. Bluestone claimed to be sending out informational advisories on legal issues, but a judge ruled that he was promoting his practice

I suppose you’re upset that the judge declined to buy the Brooklyn Bridge from Mr. Bluestone, as well?

Yeah, sure, he was sending out the information out of the goodness of his heart. I’ll bet he didn’t make any effort to share any advisories with anyone not in a position to purchase his services.

]]>