It’s between two of legal academia’s best-known bloggers — Gordon Smith of The Conglomerate and Steve Bainbridge of the eponymous blog — and it concerns who should be more the boss in corporate governance, directors or shareholders. Catch it here.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on September 12, 2006
It’s between two of legal academia’s best-known bloggers — Gordon Smith of The Conglomerate and Steve Bainbridge of the eponymous blog — and it concerns who should be more the boss in corporate governance, directors or shareholders. Catch it here.
Tagged as: class actions

Get your copy today! My new book tackles the question of why so many bad ideas come from the law schools. "Cutting-edge commentary, hard-hitting, witty, astute." -- Publisher's Weekly. "Excellent... A fine dissection of these strangely powerful institutions" -- Wall Street Journal.
Individual liberty, free markets, and peace: the world's premier libertarian think tank. Publishes Cato at Liberty, where I blog on contemporary policy issues.
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIY Themes.
{ 1 comment }
Business judgment is what directors are supposed to use to fulfill their fiduciary obligation to shareholders. The fiduciary obligation is paramount. When business judgment produces wealth not for the shareholders but for directors and senior managers, the fiduciary obligation has been breached.
The law needs to find a workable method of wreaking financial and additional ruin on those who breach fiduciary obligations. The punitive consequences should vastly exceed the money involved in the fiduciary failure.
Comments on this entry are closed.