Comments on: “FDA ends ban on silicone breast implants” http://overlawyered.com/2006/11/fda-ends-ban-on-silicone-breast-implants/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=fda-ends-ban-on-silicone-breast-implants Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sun, 27 May 2012 05:00:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Howard Erichson http://overlawyered.com/2006/11/fda-ends-ban-on-silicone-breast-implants/comment-page-1/#comment-4798 Howard Erichson Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:24:52 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4200#comment-4798 I agree with you that the Sun's editorial draws "some of the appropriate conclusions," but I'd emphasize the word "some." As I've raised on the Mass Tort Litigation Blog, <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2006/11/ny_sun_editoria.html," rel="nofollow">http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2006/11/ny_sun_editoria.html,</a> don't you think the Sun gets sloppy in lumping together the problems of the breast implant litigation with those of asbestos and Vioxx? I agree with you that the Sun’s editorial draws “some of the appropriate conclusions,” but I’d emphasize the word “some.” As I’ve raised on the Mass Tort Litigation Blog, http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mass_tort_litigation/2006/11/ny_sun_editoria.html, don’t you think the Sun gets sloppy in lumping together the problems of the breast implant litigation with those of asbestos and Vioxx?

]]>