Comments on: “Thinking up new ways to get you 100 percent or more!” http://overlawyered.com/2007/02/thinking-up-new-ways-to-get-you-100-percent-or-more/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=thinking-up-new-ways-to-get-you-100-percent-or-more Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sun, 27 May 2012 05:00:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Piotr Reysner http://overlawyered.com/2007/02/thinking-up-new-ways-to-get-you-100-percent-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-5974 Piotr Reysner Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:13:52 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4548#comment-5974 Because you only "deserve" 67% minus costs. Therefore, you get 100% of what you deserve. This guy deserves a hammer to the foot. Because you only “deserve” 67% minus costs. Therefore, you get 100% of what you deserve.

This guy deserves a hammer to the foot.

]]> By: John http://overlawyered.com/2007/02/thinking-up-new-ways-to-get-you-100-percent-or-more/comment-page-1/#comment-5973 John Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:27:12 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4548#comment-5973 If he is getting me "100% of the benefits I deserve," how is "The Hammer" getting paid? If he is getting me “100% of the benefits I deserve,” how is “The Hammer” getting paid?

]]>