Reasonable foreseeability? “A woman has won nearly $240,000 compensation from RailCorp after a judge ruled she was raped because she had broken her ankle weeks earlier at a Sydney railway station. RailCorp was found responsible for the woman’s rape at a private home, because she could not escape with her leg in plaster, and for her subsequent depression.” (Geesche Jacobsen, “A fall, a rape – and $240,000″, Sydney Morning Herald, Apr. 26).


{ 2 comments }
Perhaps the defense should argue that because she was incapacitated at home she was never hit by a bus, mugged on the way to work, or succumbed to skin cancer 30 years from now, and thus she owes them a million dollars for that favor; maybe they can just call it even.
And if she had successfully defended herself by beating the attacker with her crutches, then he would be suing the railroad…
Comments on this entry are closed.