"Well, we changed our mind" doesn't strike Carter at ShopFloor as a very good reason for Congress to yank back a former liability protection. Earlier here, here, here, etc.... […]
Beck and Herrmann explain why the Mountain State's inroads on the learned intermediary doctrine are a serious matter, especially since forum-shopping could lead to the application of the state's liberal rule to drug injuries alleged to have occurred in other... […]
New Jersey Lawsuit Reform Alliance reports that incoming chief executive Chris Christie has given encouraging pledges on forum-shopping, class actions, and expert witness standards.... […]
Michael Barone in the WSJ: The unions' unprecedented political push in 2008 has not been unnoticed by the voters. Mr. Corzine's cozy relationship with public employee union heads proved a liability in New Jersey, and in Virginia Mr. McDonnell campaigned... […]
This fall is the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall and other events associated with the collapse of communism. Paul Hollander, a sociologist who has written numerous works on communism and Western attitudes towards it, has an op ed in the Washington Post, noting some of the lessons of the communist [...] […]
From Donovan v. Grand Victoria Casino & Resort (Oct. 30), in which the Indiana Court of Appeals so holds, and cites a 1982 New Jersey case so holding: [The casino] may not simply take refuge in the common law right of exclusion, inasmuch as it is the public policy of this State that gambling is subject [...] […]
All of us at the Institute for Justice want to thank Eugene for giving us an opportunity to discuss our latest case this week (previous posts here, here, here, and here). I want to use this last post to respond to a few comments. First, some people have argued in the comments that just because a [...] […]
Jeff Rowes (Institute for Justice), guest-blogging
A Ninth Circuit panel said no in June, and I thought its ruling was correct, though I disapproved of San Francisco’s resolution on nonconstitutional grounds. But yesterday, the Ninth Circuit agreed to rehear the case en banc, so it might be that the panel decision will be reversed (though I still think that it’s [...] […]
Winston-Salem, N.C., had an ordinance that provided, (b) It shall be unlawful for a person to remain or wander about in a public place under circumstances manifesting the purpose to engage in a violation of the North Carolina Controlled Substances Act, G.S. 90–89 et seq. Such circumstances are: (1) Repeatedly beckoning to, stopping or attempting to stop [. […]