Professor Bainbridge has some thoughts on a policy apparently pursued by some landlords (at least when the law permits them to do so) (May 15).
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
by Walter Olson on May 16, 2007
Professor Bainbridge has some thoughts on a policy apparently pursued by some landlords (at least when the law permits them to do so) (May 15).

Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIY Themes.
{ 5 comments }
Wow. Lawyers really are hated, aren’t they? I wonder if the same prejudice applies to district attorneys or transactional attorneys.
I wouldn’t assume that these policies necessarily signify that lawyers are “hated”. Lawyers may simply be perceived as more likely to take an adversarial stance when frictions come up in the landlord-tenant relationship, or more skilled at using legal process in a way damaging to the landlord’s interests when a dispute does arise. This practical set of expectations may be enough to explain such a policy without positing any special or further animus toward lawyers as a class — indeed, the landlord who chooses among tenants on this basis might well be a lawyer himself or herself.
OR…
it could be because of the well-deserved reputation of abusing the legal system for frivolous or malicious means.
I’ve yet to encounter a lawyer in a professional setting who didn’t fit this description, or made reference to it on several occasions.
Re post #2:
No, believe me, lawyers are hated.
Walter is pointing out the existence of a new type of discrimination.
A statute may remedy that wrong, the Americans with Too Much Abilities Act.
Comments on this entry are closed.