<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sebok on the Pearson pants suit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/sebok-on-the-pearson-pants-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/sebok-on-the-pearson-pants-suit/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/sebok-on-the-pearson-pants-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-8091</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5083#comment-8091</guid>
		<description>The issue, as usual, is with judges.  They won&#039;t pull the trigger on obvious Rule 11 violations, though many of them are quick to punish attorneys for perceived slights to their honor or technical flubs.  I wouldn&#039;t suggest that judges should be cavalier about sanctions, but it&#039;s pretty clear that Rule 11 is the shotgun no one will take off the wall.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue, as usual, is with judges.  They won&#8217;t pull the trigger on obvious Rule 11 violations, though many of them are quick to punish attorneys for perceived slights to their honor or technical flubs.  I wouldn&#8217;t suggest that judges should be cavalier about sanctions, but it&#8217;s pretty clear that Rule 11 is the shotgun no one will take off the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

