<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The indefatigable Judge Roy Pearson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-indefatigable-judge-roy-pearson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-indefatigable-judge-roy-pearson/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melvin</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-indefatigable-judge-roy-pearson/comment-page-1/#comment-8243</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5113#comment-8243</guid>
		<description>The saying is true here:  Those lawyers who represent themselves at trial have a fool for a client.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The saying is true here:  Those lawyers who represent themselves at trial have a fool for a client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-Bell</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-indefatigable-judge-roy-pearson/comment-page-1/#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator>E-Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5113#comment-8242</guid>
		<description>This is not surprising.  Most folks who lose at trial will at least file a motion for new trial.

And it&#039;s especially easy for Pearson to keep up this charade because he is representing himself.  He doesn&#039;t have to worry about paying anyone for the inevitable appeal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not surprising.  Most folks who lose at trial will at least file a motion for new trial.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s especially easy for Pearson to keep up this charade because he is representing himself.  He doesn&#8217;t have to worry about paying anyone for the inevitable appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hertzberg</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-indefatigable-judge-roy-pearson/comment-page-1/#comment-8241</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hertzberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5113#comment-8241</guid>
		<description>Since the ineluctable conclusion about all this is that Roy Pearson is suffering from a serious mental illness, isn&#039;t it possible for someone to commence proceedings to have him involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility?  I&#039;m not kidding.  Is there any way he could be pursuing this thing and not be so out of touch with reality as to compel a diagnosis of severe mental illness?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the ineluctable conclusion about all this is that Roy Pearson is suffering from a serious mental illness, isn&#8217;t it possible for someone to commence proceedings to have him involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility?  I&#8217;m not kidding.  Is there any way he could be pursuing this thing and not be so out of touch with reality as to compel a diagnosis of severe mental illness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/07/the-indefatigable-judge-roy-pearson/comment-page-1/#comment-8240</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5113#comment-8240</guid>
		<description>I thought the purpose of letting this farce play out was to eliminate his grounds for appeal.

What went wrong?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the purpose of letting this farce play out was to eliminate his grounds for appeal.</p>
<p>What went wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

