Dan Rather vs. CBS, cont’d

by Walter Olson on September 23, 2007

Beldar doesn’t hold back (Sept. 22) from telling us what he thinks:

Rather’s case — as incredibly, stinkingly, appallingly, cosmically bogus as it is — nevertheless has some considerable settlement value: Not because CBS is likely to lose to Rather if the truth is confirmed in court, but because individual decision-makers within CBS may have overwhelming vested interests in ensuring that the facts are not thoroughly probed in court.

Earlier: Sept. 19. More buzz: Howard Kurtz/WaPo, Eugene Volokh, New York Post “Page Six”, Bertovici/Portfolio.com.

{ 1 comment }

1 Vigilante 09.23.07 at 1:14 pm

This morning Daniel Schorr speaks for me on Dan Rather. Dan Rather’s anchor is still dragging.

Comments on this entry are closed.