<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas: &#8220;Public left in dark on accused attorneys&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/texas-public-left-in-dark-on-accused-attorneys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/texas-public-left-in-dark-on-accused-attorneys/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mary Johnson</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/texas-public-left-in-dark-on-accused-attorneys/comment-page-1/#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mary Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5361#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>Hi Walter.  You were linked by Kevin M.D.

And I have some thoughts on the question he poses (as I found it a bit disingenuous):

&lt;a href=&quot;http://drjshousecalls.blogspot.com/2007/09/hey-kevin-hey-ed-public-is-left-in-dark.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://drjshousecalls.blogspot.com/2007/09/hey-kevin-hey-ed-public-is-left-in-dark.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Walter.  You were linked by Kevin M.D.</p>
<p>And I have some thoughts on the question he poses (as I found it a bit disingenuous):</p>
<p><a href="http://drjshousecalls.blogspot.com/2007/09/hey-kevin-hey-ed-public-is-left-in-dark.html" rel="nofollow">http://drjshousecalls.blogspot.com/2007/09/hey-kevin-hey-ed-public-is-left-in-dark.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex Mex</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/09/texas-public-left-in-dark-on-accused-attorneys/comment-page-1/#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex Mex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5361#comment-9041</guid>
		<description>The Bar should at least publish or broadcast the following PSA:

&quot;If you or a loved one obtained an adverse result because your lawyer was a felon, you may be entitled to compens... &quot;strike that&quot;...you may be pleased to know that your lawyer may at some later, undetermined date, be investigated by a private grievance committee, the results of which may be published at some later, undetermined time, in a vague manner, in the rear portions of an obscure trade publication available only to members of the trade, but the results will otherwise remain strictly confidential.&quot;

Have a nice day.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bar should at least publish or broadcast the following PSA:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you or a loved one obtained an adverse result because your lawyer was a felon, you may be entitled to compens&#8230; &#8220;strike that&#8221;&#8230;you may be pleased to know that your lawyer may at some later, undetermined date, be investigated by a private grievance committee, the results of which may be published at some later, undetermined time, in a vague manner, in the rear portions of an obscure trade publication available only to members of the trade, but the results will otherwise remain strictly confidential.&#8221;</p>
<p>Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

