<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: flying-imams suit can proceed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/update-flying-imams-suit-can-proceed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/update-flying-imams-suit-can-proceed/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nieporent</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/update-flying-imams-suit-can-proceed/comment-page-1/#comment-9650</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nieporent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5574#comment-9650</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Montgomery, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, said the facts they alleged &quot;support the existence of an unconstitutional custom of arresting individuals without probable cause based on their race.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

So according to this learned judge, Muslim is a race.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Montgomery, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, said the facts they alleged &#8220;support the existence of an unconstitutional custom of arresting individuals without probable cause based on their race.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So according to this learned judge, Muslim is a race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Neal</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/update-flying-imams-suit-can-proceed/comment-page-1/#comment-9649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5574#comment-9649</guid>
		<description>Even if they do eventually throw in the towel, a large chunk of money will go to fees.  Again, we take money away from production due to our abused system.  Judges are supposed to be gatekeepers - they tend to forget that these days.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if they do eventually throw in the towel, a large chunk of money will go to fees.  Again, we take money away from production due to our abused system.  Judges are supposed to be gatekeepers &#8211; they tend to forget that these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/update-flying-imams-suit-can-proceed/comment-page-1/#comment-9648</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5574#comment-9648</guid>
		<description>Althouse (like most law professors) skips an essential step in declaring, &quot;let&#039;s get to the factfinding.&quot;

First, let&#039;s get to discovery.  Will the imams willingly submit to depositions?  Or will they throw in the towel -- as so many frivolous litigants do -- when faced with the prospect of giving deposition testimony under oath to support their claims?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Althouse (like most law professors) skips an essential step in declaring, &#8220;let&#8217;s get to the factfinding.&#8221;</p>
<p>First, let&#8217;s get to discovery.  Will the imams willingly submit to depositions?  Or will they throw in the towel &#8212; as so many frivolous litigants do &#8212; when faced with the prospect of giving deposition testimony under oath to support their claims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supremacy Claus</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2007/11/update-flying-imams-suit-can-proceed/comment-page-1/#comment-9647</link>
		<dc:creator>Supremacy Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5574#comment-9647</guid>
		<description>The Justice Department has the choice of asking the judge to dismiss the case, even after a verdict returns. The reason is national security. The judge would have no choice, nor even hesitation, but to comply.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Justice Department has the choice of asking the judge to dismiss the case, even after a verdict returns. The reason is national security. The judge would have no choice, nor even hesitation, but to comply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

