http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sun, 27 May 2012 13:04:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides/comment-page-1/#comment-10375 Tracy Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:38:20 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5766#comment-10375 From what I understand, the secondary "author" didn't actually create any part of the book. They simply set up a wiki-style website that others submitted articles to. I'm not sure what that will do to their position in this case, but if they prevail I would be willing to bet there will be a follow-up lawsuit by the contributors. From what I understand, the secondary “author” didn’t actually create any part of the book. They simply set up a wiki-style website that others submitted articles to. I’m not sure what that will do to their position in this case, but if they prevail I would be willing to bet there will be a follow-up lawsuit by the contributors.

]]> http://overlawyered.com/2008/01/harry-potter-inc-vs-fan-guides/comment-page-1/#comment-10374 Therese Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:17:33 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5766#comment-10374 I did some reading around and found <a href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1133911.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> and <a href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/1120572.html" rel="nofollow">this</a>. It seems that Ms Rowling has a better case than Mr Wu lets on. I did some reading around and found this and this. It seems that Ms Rowling has a better case than Mr Wu lets on.

]]>