NYU student Avram Wisnia was “horsing around a kiddie pool filled with gelatin” at a dorm party in 2004 when he was pushed and broke his hip. A judge has now ruled he cannot sue the university for allowing the event and having the school food service furnish the gelatin, the risks of such a recreation being obvious enough to put him on notice. (”No Go In Jell-o Wrestling Lawsuit Against NYU”, AP/WNBC, Jan. 29).
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
-
Point of Law- "Right and Left Join Forces on Criminal Justice"Adam Liptak's article brings front-page New York Times attention to a welcome trend that's been building for years now. Commentary: Adler/Volokh.... […]Walter Olson
- House/Senate divide on state med-mal limitsThe Texas Medical Association, unlike some physician groups, refuses to support the health care bill on Capitol Hill. One of its particular concerns: TMA wants the legislation to explicitly protect the state's caps on non-economic damages in malpractice lawsuits. The... […]Walter Olson
- "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble"The Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform has published a substantial new study (PDF) of the dangers of third-party litigation financing. The authors are John Beisner, Jessica Miller and Gary Rubin of Skadden Arps. Executive summary: "Third-party litigation financing" is a... […]Walter Olson
- State of play on Alien Tort litigationLee G. Dunst of Gibson Dunn, writing in the New York Law Journal (PDF), reviews recent cases and concludes that the courts are tending to dismiss most actions filed under the Alien Tort Claims Act (also known as the Alien... […]Walter Olson
- Higher punitives for wealthier malefactorsIra Stoll at Future of Capitalism has some doubts about that new $300 million tobacco verdict.... […]Walter Olson
- "Right and Left Join Forces on Criminal Justice"
- Volokh
- So . . . Where Are The (Argued) Supreme Court Opinions?As Thanksgiving draws near, I began wondering where the argued Supreme Court opinions are. Sure, we’ve had three per curiam summary reversals, but usually by this point in November, we’ve had at least an opinion or two released in an argued case. The next hand-down opportunity comes on November 30, and if we get an [...] […]John Elwood
- “Climategate” and the Social Validation of KnowledgeRecent evidence that prominent climate scientists have tried to intimidate academic journals into not publishing papers submitted by “climate change” skeptics have caused a major brouhaha in the ongoing political battle over global warming. At least some of the scientists in question certainly seem to have put ideology above the search for truth. The [. […]Ilya Somin
- New York Court of Appeals Upholds Atlantic Yards CondemnationsThe New York Court of Appeals has issued its opinion in Goldstein v. New York State Urban Development Corporation, an important property rights case. The 6–1 decision upholds the condemnation of numerous properties in the Atlantic Yards area for the purpose of transferring them to powerful developer Bruce Ratner, who plans to use most of [...] […]Ilya Somin
- Originalism and the Sixth Amendment Right “to have the Assistance of Counsel”The briefs filed in McDonald v. City of Chicago have raised a lot of questions here about the role of originalism versus stare decisis in constitutional interpretation. Some have argued that stare decisis must give way to correctness on these issues as a matter of constitutional purity: We should always follow the original public [...] […]Orin Kerr
- DOJ Files Brief Supporting Super-En-Banc in CDTYesterday the Justice Department filed its Brief in Support of Rehearing En Banc By the Full Court in United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, the blockbuster computer search and seizure case I have blogged a lot about. From the introduction: The en banc panel’s decision announced sweeping new rules for warrants to search computers that [...] […]Orin Kerr
- So . . . Where Are The (Argued) Supreme Court Opinions?
Media Bloggers Association
CPSIA
{ 5 comments }
“Wisnia’s 2005 lawsuit blamed NYU for allowing the event …”
Oh, for crying out loud…had they not allowed it they’d get sued for that on some grounds. Paranoid risk managers ruin a lot of fun these days.
Does NYU have a duty to prevent horsing around? Come on! It’s a wrestling dorm party! What are they supposed to do, sit around sipping tea and reminisce?
NYU spokesman Beckman appears to have his tongue firmly in cheek when he said “This case broke the [Jello?] mold but in the end justice was served sweetly.”
Summary judgment is a dish best served cold!
Hey, can this go in the “Eat, Drink, And Be Merry” section? I know that Jello Wrestling isn’t eating or drinking, but it involves food and you have to admit that it’s usually merry.
Assumption of risk?!?
YAY!!!!!!!!!
It’s so good to see that AoR is not completely dead.
In a coma with life-threatening injuries, but not dead just yet. Don’t worry, the lawyers are sending hit teams daily.
This is an outrage! How’s a plaintiff expected to make a living? How about their attorneys? What are they to do? These victims have rights, too, ya know.
Its as bad as the case i read a few years ago where some idiot thought it would be funny to moon someone from the 4th or 5th story of his college dorm he did so but the window screen gave way and he fell and injured himself and tried to sue over it. Too bad the jerk should have consited the consequences of his act of stupidity
Comments on this entry are closed.