<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Client-chasing dot-orgs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/comment-page-1/#comment-11382</link>
		<dc:creator>David Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6025#comment-11382</guid>
		<description>While .org was once reserved for non-profit organizations, it is not a gTLD (generic top level domain) just like .com and .net. Anyone can get a .org domain for any reason.

Basically, non-profits need to get a .com domain anyway to protect their name and prevent people looking for them from finding other companies. So it didn&#039;t seem fair to prohibit the same protection for for-profit organizations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While .org was once reserved for non-profit organizations, it is not a gTLD (generic top level domain) just like .com and .net. Anyone can get a .org domain for any reason.</p>
<p>Basically, non-profits need to get a .com domain anyway to protect their name and prevent people looking for them from finding other companies. So it didn&#8217;t seem fair to prohibit the same protection for for-profit organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZFlyer</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/comment-page-1/#comment-11381</link>
		<dc:creator>AZFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6025#comment-11381</guid>
		<description>&quot;And what&#039;s with the law firms&#039; having managed to secure dot-org domains for these ventures, just as if they were nonprofit or something?&quot;

Pretty much anyone can get a .org domain.  It is recommended that .org be used for non-profit organizations, but no one actually enforces it.  Replace the .com with .org on most large corporate sites and you&#039;ll get the same company (i.e. www.microsoft.org).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And what&#8217;s with the law firms&#8217; having managed to secure dot-org domains for these ventures, just as if they were nonprofit or something?&#8221;</p>
<p>Pretty much anyone can get a .org domain.  It is recommended that .org be used for non-profit organizations, but no one actually enforces it.  Replace the .com with .org on most large corporate sites and you&#8217;ll get the same company (i.e. <a href="http://www.microsoft.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.org</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

