Massachusetts mulls “sexual fraud”

by Walter Olson on March 12, 2008

Proposed legislation establishing such an offense is arguably broad enough to cover such come-on lines as, “Single? Of course I am.” (Marc Randazza, Mar. 10, via Lat).

Related posts

{ 8 comments }

1 Hustiac 03.12.08 at 4:58 am

I could go along with this legislation if the same law also covered puffery and hyperbole uttered by candidates for political office.

2 Supremacy Claus 03.12.08 at 2:06 pm

I support this legislation. If it prevents the shock, bewilderment, and dismay of a single additional, future victim of sexual fraud, after the doffing of a figure enhancing bra, this law may avert that tragedy.

3 Jim Copland 03.12.08 at 2:21 pm

So would this law turn a simple class B solicitation misdemeanor into a felony if you, say, went under the name “George Fox”?

4 roy 03.12.08 at 4:42 pm

Does “I love you” count?

5 Insomniac 03.13.08 at 9:03 am

Or, “Of course I’ll still respect you in the morning!”

6 Melvin 03.14.08 at 3:30 am

How about the man who takes a beautiful woman to bed . . . only to find out that “she” was a “he” instead!

7 ruralcounsel 03.14.08 at 9:02 am

Or “…to love, honor, and obey…” or “…to cleave unto no other…” or “[insert your favorite marriage vow here]”

But I agree with Hustiac … more damage is done by lying politicians than by “sexual fraud”.

8 markm 03.16.08 at 8:33 am

Could a clever prosecutor stretch that to cover campaign promises made with the intention of “screwing” the public?

Comments on this entry are closed.