<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: N.H. jury: lawyer&#8217;s demand letters amounted to extortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/comment-page-1/#comment-11368</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6020#comment-11368</guid>
		<description>What would fix this: Loser pays, starting with the expenses of responding to a demand letter.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would fix this: Loser pays, starting with the expenses of responding to a demand letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/comment-page-1/#comment-11367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6020#comment-11367</guid>
		<description>In 2006 the California Supreme Court addresses the settlement-demand-as-extortion question in Flately v. Mauro, which involved some unpleasantness directed at the Lord of the Dance.  It&#039;s got a great discussion of the line between a legitimate demand and extortion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2006 the California Supreme Court addresses the settlement-demand-as-extortion question in Flately v. Mauro, which involved some unpleasantness directed at the Lord of the Dance.  It&#8217;s got a great discussion of the line between a legitimate demand and extortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

