<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pending the abolition of gravity&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/pending-the-abolition-of-gravity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/pending-the-abolition-of-gravity/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:39:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Supremacy Claus</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/04/pending-the-abolition-of-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-11571</link>
		<dc:creator>Supremacy Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6091#comment-11571</guid>
		<description>The lawsuit has all the features of a product. It is inherently harmful in its ordinary use. I suggest strict liability apply to all weak cases.

Appellate decision are based on judge errors in the law, not on errors of facts. All reversed decisions are &quot;never events.&quot; The judge should not get paid for any reversed decision.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawsuit has all the features of a product. It is inherently harmful in its ordinary use. I suggest strict liability apply to all weak cases.</p>
<p>Appellate decision are based on judge errors in the law, not on errors of facts. All reversed decisions are &#8220;never events.&#8221; The judge should not get paid for any reversed decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

