<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian tobacconist: sued if you do&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/canadian-tobacconist-sued-if-you-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/canadian-tobacconist-sued-if-you-do/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:26:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Rogers</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/canadian-tobacconist-sued-if-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-18686</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7067#comment-18686</guid>
		<description>Experience has taught me that when a story tickles my &quot;Outrage Nerve,&quot; it usually has an &quot;Easy Button&quot; but for purposes of sensationalism, the reporters sometimes skip over that part.  Is a variance not an option?  I hope at the very least that this guy can figure out how to profit from this little boondoggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experience has taught me that when a story tickles my &#8220;Outrage Nerve,&#8221; it usually has an &#8220;Easy Button&#8221; but for purposes of sensationalism, the reporters sometimes skip over that part.  Is a variance not an option?  I hope at the very least that this guy can figure out how to profit from this little boondoggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/canadian-tobacconist-sued-if-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-18599</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7067#comment-18599</guid>
		<description>both agencies should be forced to (at the least) provide written apologies to this man for the trouble they have caused</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both agencies should be forced to (at the least) provide written apologies to this man for the trouble they have caused</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ras</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/canadian-tobacconist-sued-if-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-18590</link>
		<dc:creator>ras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7067#comment-18590</guid>
		<description>An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=508f82d6-15e2-442c-ae60-3e0645046da4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;update&lt;/a&gt;:

Excerpt: &quot;City heritage planners met with the health authority and decided that antique signs advertising tobacco products at Old Morris Tobacconist, 116 Government St., can stay, though a large banner will have to be covered up.&quot;

I especially love the appellation, &quot;heritage planners.&quot;

And the principle has been confirmed, sigh, that your private activities are now subject to yes/no approvals by the bureaucrats on a case by case basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=508f82d6-15e2-442c-ae60-3e0645046da4" rel="nofollow">update</a>:</p>
<p>Excerpt: &#8220;City heritage planners met with the health authority and decided that antique signs advertising tobacco products at Old Morris Tobacconist, 116 Government St., can stay, though a large banner will have to be covered up.&#8221;</p>
<p>I especially love the appellation, &#8220;heritage planners.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the principle has been confirmed, sigh, that your private activities are now subject to yes/no approvals by the bureaucrats on a case by case basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Frank</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/canadian-tobacconist-sued-if-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-18589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7067#comment-18589</guid>
		<description>If there is anything that merits a $5000 fine for repeat offenses, it is a once-proud newspaper confusing &quot;its&quot; with &quot;it&#039;s.&quot;  Conrad Black would be rolling in his grave if he were dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is anything that merits a $5000 fine for repeat offenses, it is a once-proud newspaper confusing &#8220;its&#8221; with &#8220;it&#8217;s.&#8221;  Conrad Black would be rolling in his grave if he were dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

