What if we are “actively aligning incentives against” having such a thing? (Coyote, Apr. 14).
Separately, Coyote explains why he isn’t very active in his own blog’s comment section, though he often learns things from it.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system
-
Point of Law- "Jury rejects prosecutor's rigged game"Our own Marie Gryphon on the Bear Stearns acquittals.... […]Walter Olson
- AP poll: most favor limiting med-mal awardsA "new Associated Press poll says most Americans support curbs on medical malpractice lawsuits. The AP poll found that 54 percent favor making it harder to sue doctors and hospitals for mistakes taking care of patients, while 32 percent are... […]Walter Olson
- Around the web, November 20Moving beyond judicial elections? Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform has a new report out (PDF) on the subject of "Best Practices in Judicial Merit Selection" More: Gavel Grab. Earlier: here, here, etc. Latest from the Jury Verdict Research people:... […]Walter Olson
- Is the Bell Tolling For Philip Morris? $300M Verdict for One Former SmokerAfter getting the mammoth $145 billion judgment against it thrown out on the grounds that each member of Florida's plaintiff smoker's class had to sue separately, the suits are coming in, and the latest verdict is not good news for... […]Michael Krauss
- "Goodies for labor tucked away in health bill"There are lots of them, and they're bound to encourage more unionization among health care workers and others, according to this op-ed by A. Kevin Troutman of Fisher & Phillips for the Houston Chronicle.... […]Walter Olson
- "Jury rejects prosecutor's rigged game"
- Volokh
- How Common is the Socratic Method in Law Schools Today?In a post below, Ilya writes: The traditional law school reliance on the the Socratic method, which I criticized on other grounds in this series of posts, is part of the problem. Many professors and students assume that it is the only correct way of teaching law classes, especially large intro courses, and therefore don’t bother [...] […]Orin Kerr
- NYT on Hacked Climate E-Mails Jonathan H. Adler
- Why Tradition Does Not Justify the Socratic MethodOne of the standard defenses of the Socratic method, which I criticized in my last post and here, is adherence to tradition. If American lawprofs have been using the method for decades, there must be something to it. Who are we to question the approach that worked so well for Professor Kingsfield? I am generally [...] […]Ilya Somin
- Teaching to Different Learning Styles in Law SchoolBy nature, I am a highly verbal, nonvisual person. I learn best by reading books or listening to lectures. I rarely benefit from looking at tables, charts, pictures, and the like. I’m the kind of guy who can’t drive to an unfamiliar destination without a detailed mapquest itinerary telling me exactly which turns to take; [...] […]Ilya Somin
- Missouri Court Upholds Statute Against Gun Possession While IntoxicatedMissouri v. Richard was decided earlier this week by the Missouri Supreme Court, solely on the basis of the Missouri Constitution. Missouri law, Section 571.030.1(5) punishes someone who “Possesses or discharges a firearm or projectile weapon while intoxicated.” Richard did in fact possess a loaded handgun while intoxicated (eventually to the point of u […]David Kopel
- How Common is the Socratic Method in Law Schools Today?
Media Bloggers Association
CPSIA
{ 1 comment }
You bet the lawyers were involved with this one from the getgo.
from the National Academy of Engineering Website:
http://www.onlineethics.diamax.com/CMS/profpractice/exempindex/lemesindex/6.aspx
On July 31, 1978, LeMessurier contacted the lawyer of the architectural firm that had retained him as its structural consultant for the Citicorp tower and then the firm’s insurance company. As a result, a meeting was arranged the following day with several lawyers for the insurers, to whom LeMessurier related the entire story. The lawyers soon decided to bring in a special consultant — Les Robertson, a respected structural engineer. Robertson listened to LeMessurier’s description of the situation and soon took a more critical view than even LeMessurier himself. Robertson did not believe, for instance, that the tuned mass damper would serve as a safety device despite LeMessurier’s assurances that generators could keep the dampers running during an electrical power loss.
Comments on this entry are closed.